| 1. Confirm pipe outside diameter | Minimum and maximum pipe outside diameter (OD) | Example production range: 12–60 mm OD. Common nominal tube sizes in this range include 12, 16, 20, 25, 32, 40, 50, and 60 mm. | The machine tooling, die opening, frame clearance, and forming force must cover the complete OD range without exceeding the rated capacity. |
| 2. Define wall thickness | Minimum, nominal, and maximum wall thickness | A representative light- to medium-wall tube range is 0.8–3.0 mm. The exact limit depends on OD, material strength, die design, and the required reduction or expansion. | Wall thickness affects forming load, risk of buckling, end cracking, and the number of forming stages required. |
| 3. Match the pipe material | Material grade, yield strength, ductility, and surface condition | Typical materials: • Low-carbon steel: approximately 200–350 MPa yield strength • 304 stainless steel: approximately 200–300 MPa yield strength • 6061-T6 aluminum: approximately 240 MPa yield strength | Higher-strength or less-ductile materials generally require greater force, better lubrication, controlled speed, or multiple passes. |
| 4. Calculate swaging capacity | Maximum forming diameter, wall thickness, reduction ratio, and available force | For preliminary selection, specify the largest OD and wall thickness together, not separately. A sample requirement may be 50 mm OD × 2.5 mm wall with a 10–20% end reduction. | A machine rated for a large diameter may not achieve the same capacity at maximum wall thickness or with high-strength alloys. |
| 5. Select the forming method | Rotary, radial, hydraulic, mechanical, or other forming process | Use rotary or radial swaging when gradual circumferential forming and repeatable ends are important; use hydraulic or mechanical systems when a defined axial stroke and high production force are required. | The process determines tooling flexibility, noise, cycle behavior, end geometry, and suitability for thin-wall or hard materials. |
| 6. Check production requirements | Cycle time, daily output, setup time, and automation level | For planning, compare the required output with the complete cycle: loading, clamping, swaging, unloading, inspection, and die change. A 30-second forming stroke does not necessarily mean a 30-second finished-part cycle. | Actual throughput is controlled by handling and setup time as well as the forming stroke. |
| 7. Verify tooling and quality controls | Die availability, dimensional tolerance, concentricity, surface finish, and inspection method | Define the finished-end dimensions, allowable ovality, transition length, surface marks, and inspection tools such as plug gauges, calipers, micrometers, or coordinate measurement equipment. | Correct tooling and measurable acceptance criteria are essential for consistent fit-up, sealing, welding, and assembly. |